…men have come to
consider pardon, and safety, and the hope , not very animated, of a future
Heaven, as the whole of salvation - all of it at least that is dispensed to us
in this life - holiness and happiness, the blessed remainder, being waited for
till we die. To the scriptural doctrine
of imputed righteousness, by which we stand justified and sinless in the sight
of God, has been joined and in a manner confounded with it, an idea of imputed
sanctification - by which, without any change wrought in us, we become holy and
prepared for bliss at the same moment that we are pardoned and justified in
Christ - nothing more being to be done by us, or in us, until the day of our
removal hence; thus denying altogether the idea of progressive sanctification,
or any sanctification at all, except as imputed to us from the perfect merits
of our blessed Lord….I have observed the
consequences of this base contentedness with an unhallowed and unhappy safety;
the half of what Christ has promised, and that not the better half, since if
his mercy rested there, it would be unavailing to us; it would have remitted
our misery without making us blessed; it would have sent us from prison with our
fetters on, and preferred us to a heaven that would not suit us when we come
there: the little taste for that heaven
evinced by persons of this condition, is a proof that it would not. From this low estimate of what salvation is,
I have observed to result a life and conversation proportionately low; very
little of enjoyment; a stupid expectation, that scarcely ever warms into
desire….there is no desire for the Bridegroom's coming, because there is no
assimilation of character to make the blest companionship delightful….But if,
on this, you advise them to become more fit, by a closer walk with God, they
recur to first principles - there fitness is of God - He has promised -
justified in Christ, they know that they are saved. Most precious truths! Enough, one would
think, to make us long after Him as the hart panteth for the water-brooks, and
lose all care for what may intervene, in watchful expectation of His
coming. But they have no such effect in
this case: time loses little of its
importance - earth but little of its influence….Is it not true, then, that they
who rest satisfied with a bare and
barren hope of being safe for eternity, by which little more is understood than
safety from the punishment of hell, do meanly estimate the Redeemer's work,
accept but the half of what he has purchased, and wearily and unsafely postpone
the other half, as something beyond our present reach. True, it is beyond our present reach in its
ultimate perfection…But is that a reason they should not begin? …..Should we
make so light of the Savior's gift as to be in no haste to enjoy it till we
possess it all, if indeed we can possess in eternity what we have made no
progress towards in time? …I see no security for them in the word of God; I see
there, on the contrary, that growth, increase, progression, are the terms in
which the divine life is spoken of; "increasing in stature,"
"growing into the likeness," "going on to perfection." Such figures and expressions do not
characterize that sudden change at death which some rely on. The first sowing of the seed is a momentary
act; the putting in of the sickle is momentary also; but it grows not in an
hour, it ripens not in a day. Does the
husbandman, when he comes into his field to reap, expect to find it as he left
it when he sowed? Or when suns have
shone on it in vain, and in vain the waters of heaven descended, will it start
into perfection under the reaper's sickle?
Caroline
Wilson
No comments:
Post a Comment