Every one who
divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an
adulteress(Matt 5:32). The compact of
marriage is a matter of such sacredness that it is not nullified even by
separation. For if a wife marries while
her husband is still alive, even if he has left her, she commits adultery, and
he who left her is the cause of this evil.
I wonder, however, whether, just as one can renounce an adulterous wife,
it is also impossible to marry another when one has renounced her. Holy Scripture makes this a difficult problem
since the apostle says, on the authority of the Lord, that a woman should not
leave her husband; but that if she does so, she must remain unmarried or be
reconciled to her husband. Yet she
should not in any case leave her husband and remain unmarried unless he is an
adulterer; for by leaving him she might
cause one who was not an adulterer before to commit adultery (Matt 5:32). Still, if she cannot exercise continence, she
may properly be reconciled to her husband if she puts up with him or if he
changes his ways. But I do not see how a
man could be allowed to marry another when he has left an adulterous wife since
a woman is not allowed to marry another man if she leaves an adulterous
husband. Since this is so, the bond of
fellowship between the spouses is so strong that although they are joined
together for the sake of begetting children, this bond is not to be broken in
order to beget them. A man might divorce
a barren woman and marry a woman who would bear him children, but this is not
allowed. And in our time Roman custom
forbids having more than one living wife by taking an additional wife. To be sure, if a man or a woman were to
abandon an adulterous spouse and marry another, more children would be
produced. But since the divine rule
seems to forbid this, it makes very clear the strength of the marriage
bond. I do not think that it could ever
have such great force unless there were attached to it the sacral power of
something greater than this weak mortality of ours, a bond which, although
people abandon it and desire to nullify it, still remains unshaken and able to
bring them punishment.
Augustine of Hippo
Showing posts with label Divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Divorce. Show all posts
Monday, January 6, 2014
Monday, November 5, 2012
Quote of the Day
God makes your
marriage indissoluble, "What therefore God has joined together let no man
put asunder" (Matt. 19:6) God joins
you together in marriage; it is his act, not yours. Do not confound your love for one another
with God.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Quote of the Day
In other
words, Jesus came not only to fulfill the law in his own work, he came to take
his people to a radical understanding of the law and a radical obedience to the
law that is not based on law but on himself, and therefore reflects the
fullness of what God wills for us - and especially reflects the gospel, the
covenant-keeping work of Christ at Calvary for his church. Marriage among Christians is mainly meant to
tell the truth about the gospel - that Christ died for his church who loves him
and never breaks his covenant with his bride.
In essence, Jesus
says, 'You have heard that it was said, 'You are permitted to divorce.' But I say to you, 'I have come to conquer the
hardness of your heart. I have come to die
for your sins. I have come to count you
as righteous. I have come to show you
the drama that marriage was meant to represent in my sacrificial,
covenant-keeping love for my sinful bride.
I have come to give you the power to stay married, or to stay single, so
that either way you keep your promises and show what my covenant is like and
how sacred is the covenant bond of marriage.
John Piper
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Quote of the Day
On Divorce: …Clearly Jesus
sees a tension between Deuteronomy 24 and Genesis 1-2. The but
at the beginning of verse 6 ('But from the beginning of Creation…') means:
God's will about divorce in Genesis 1-2 is not the same as his will expressed
in Deuteronomy 24. So the question is: Which way will Jesus go? Will he say, 'Well, there is still hardness
of heart today, even in my disciples, and so Deuteronomy expresses God's will
for my followers today'? Or will he say,
"I am the Messiah, the Christ. The
Son of Man has come into the world to gather a people who by faith in him and
union with him display the true meaning of marriage in the way they keep their
marriage covenant'? Will the emphasis
fall on the fact that in the church there is still hardness of heart, or will
the emphasis fall on the fact that the old has passed away and the new has come
(2 Cor. 5:17)?
John Piper
Saturday, April 14, 2012
Quote of the Day
"Be subject to
your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won
without a word by the conduct of their wives." If you didn't care about
the Bible, you might say, "Submission has to mean taking a husband the way
he is and not trying to change him."
But if you believe what the Bible says, you conclude that submission,
paradoxically, is sometimes a strategy for changing him.
John Piper
Monday, April 2, 2012
Quote of the Day
Mathew 5:32 states:
'Every one who divorces his wife, except for the cause of unchastity, makes her
commit adultery; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.' If
with Erasmus we suppose that 'divorce' here means 'the complete dissolution of
the marriage', the logic of this statement seems defective or at least unfair.
For on this understanding Mathew 5:32a means that divorce with the right to
remarry is only valid if the wife commits the particular sin of adultery. Yet in other situations that result in
divorce neither party can remarry as the unconditional statement of Mathew
5:32b declares. Now if the sin of
adultery results in the complete dissolution of the marriage, that allows both
parties, the adulterous wife and the innocent husband, to remarry! Dupont regards it as 'manifestly absurd' to
allow a woman divorced for adultery to remarry, but to deny this right to a
woman divorced for another reason.
This absurdity may
be alleviated, as Dupont suggests, if one supposes that the divorced adulteress
is refused the right of remarriage, but the innocent husband may remarry
(=Erasmian view). But this is effectively to allow polygamy! For if the woman cannot remarry she is not
technically divorced, but separated. The marriage bond with her husband still exists: that is why remarrying a
divorced woman is adultery (5:32b). Thus
her former husband is really becoming a bigamist if he takes a second wife
since the marital bond with his former spouse has not been dissolved. The early church view, in contrast, leads to
no such contradiction. In no case is
there the right of remarriage. Immorality may justify separation but not
remarriage: in every case remarriage involves adultery.
William A. Heath and Gordan Wenham
From their book "Jesus And Divorce: The Problem of the Evangelical Consensus"
Friday, February 3, 2012
Quote of the Day
Jesus does not enjoin his disciples
to marry, but he does sanctify marriage according to the law by affirming its
indissolubility and by prohibiting the innocent party from remarrying when the
guilty partner has broken the marriage by adultery. This prohibition liberates marriage from
selfish, evil desire, and consecrates it to the service of love, which is
possible only in a life of discipleship.
Jesus does not depreciate the body and its natural instincts, but he
does condemn the unbelief which is so often latent in its desires…Even our
bodies belong to Christ and have their part in the life of discipleship, for
they are members of his Body.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Quote of the Day
STAYING SINGLE TO
SHOW THE TRUTH.
Keep your marriage
vows in such a way as to tell the truth about the unbreakable covenant love of
Christ. But to close this chapter, I
want to emphasize that what Jesus says here in Mark 10:10-12 is incredibly good
news - even to those who have been divorced and are remarried. Here's why:
Jesus says, 'Don't divorce your spouse and marry someone else. If you do, you've committed
adultery." Why is it adultery? Ultimately, it
is adultery because it betrays the truth about Christ that marriage is meant to
display. Jesus never, never does that to
his bride, the church. He never forsakes
her. He never abandons her. He never abuses her. He always loves her. He always takes her back when she
wanders. He always is patient with
her. He always cares for her and
provides for her and protects her and, wonder of wonders, delights in her. And you - you who are married once, married
five times, married never - if you repent and trust Christ - receive him as the
Treasure who bore your punishment and became your righteousness - you are in
the bride. And this is how he relates to you. ….The radical call of Jesus never
to divorce and remarry is a declaration of the gospel by which people who have
failed may be saved. If Christ were not this way, we would all be
undone. But this is how true, how
faithful, how forgiving he is.
Therefore, we are saved.
John Piper
Monday, December 12, 2011
Quote of the Day
When Christ divorces we may....…if Christ ever abandons and
discards his church, then a man may divorce his wife. And if the blood-bought church, under the new
covenant, ever ceases to be the bride of Christ, then a wife may legitimately
divorce her husband. But as long as
Christ keeps his covenant with the church, and as long as the church, by the
omnipotent grace of God, remains the chosen people of Christ, then the very
meaning of marriage will include: What God has joined, only God can separate.
John Piper
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)