And as he
passed by he saw Levi, the son of Alphaeus, sitting at the place of toll, and
he saith unto him, Follow me. And he
arose and followed him. (Mark 2.14)"
The call goes forth,
and is at once followed by the response of obedience. The response of the disciples is an act of
obedience, not a confession of faith in Jesus.
How could the call immediately evoke obedience? The story is a stumbling-block for the
natural reason, and it is no wonder that frantic attempts have been made to
separate the two events. By hook or by
crook a bridge must be found between them.
Something must have happened in between, some psychological or
historical event. Thus we get the stupid
question: Surely the publican must have known Jesus before, and that previous
acquaintance explains his readiness to hear the Master's call. Unfortunately our text is ruthlessly silent
on this point, and in fact it regards the immediate sequence of call and
response as a matter of crucial importance.
It displays not the slightest interest in the psychological reasons for
a man's religious decisions. And
why? For the simple reason that the
cause behind the immediate following of call by response is Jesus Christ
himself. It is Jesus who calls, and
because it is Jesus, Levi follows at once.
This encounter is a testimony to the absolute, direct, and unaccountable
authority of Jesus…Jesus summons men to follow him not as a teacher or a
pattern of the good life, but as the Christ, the Son of God. In this short text Jesus Christ and his claim
are proclaimed to men. Not a word of
praise is given to the disciple for his decision for Christ. We are not expected to contemplate the
disciple, but only him who calls, and his absolute authority.
Dietrich
Bonhoeffer
No comments:
Post a Comment